What happened to the quote you sent last Tuesday?
The quotes that went silent get a follow-up that sounds like you wrote it. Because you read it before it goes.
Who agreed to what on site this morning?
For your own business, or as a service you charge other businesses like yours for.
Nobody runs this lab yet. Take it, give it your hours and your prices, and it is yours.
Decided on site, 11 August
The kitchen window moves 40 cm left so the worktop runs unbroken. The client accepts the two day delay this creates. Tiling stays the reference chosen in June.
Open, with an owner and a date
| PointPoint | WhoWho | ByBy |
|---|---|---|
| Confirm the window size | Client | 14 Aug |
| Electrician's second pass | Moreau | 18 Aug |
| Bathroom quote to resend | Us | 13 Aug |
Sent the same evening, so nobody rebuilds the meeting from memory next week.
| Point | Who | By | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Confirm the kitchen window size | Client | 14 Aug | 2 meetings |
| Electrician's second pass | Moreau | 18 Aug | 1 meeting |
| Bathroom quote to resend | Us | 13 Aug | 3 meetings |
| Tiling delivery slot | Supplier | 20 Aug | 1 meeting |
The bathroom quote has been open for three meetings and it is ours. That is the one that will be raised in front of the client on Monday.
Hello, As agreed on site this morning, the kitchen window moves 40 cm to the left. That costs two days: the opening has to be reworked before the plasterer comes back. What it buys you is a worktop that runs the whole wall without a break at the sink. That was the point you raised in June, and this is the only way to get it. One thing I need from you by Thursday 14th: confirmation of the final width, 1.20 m or 1.40 m. The joiner orders on Friday and a week is lost if we miss it. The tiling reference does not change, and the electrician comes back on the 18th. Regards, Marc
On a building site the report gets paid for twice: once in the evening when you type it up, and once three months later when nobody can find who agreed to what. A site manager running six jobs is not short of tools, they are short of the hour between the last meeting and the next one. Field report software usually asks you to fill in its forms while standing in the mud. This works the other way round: the notes you already take become a dated site report, with names and deadlines, before the memory of the morning fades.
Put there once, read by every magik.
Put there once by you, read by every magik, corrected when reality moves. Full on day one, unlike the collections below.
Worth more in month six than in week one.
The collections belong to the lab, not to any single magik. Every magik reads them and every run adds to them, which is why this lab is worth more in month six than in week one.
| Site | Decision | Who | By when |
|---|---|---|---|
| Garden side extension | Sliding door instead of the window | the client | agreed |
| Garden side extension | Threshold to redo | the mason | week 34 |
| Loft | Waiting on the electrical quote | the electrician | Friday |
Invented for this page. Your Decisions collection starts empty and fills as you work.
It wears your name, not ours.
The same lab, under your name, your colours and your logo. Your customers never see ours.
On the Pro plan, and not needed to take a lab. A fully bespoke theme exists as an upgrade, hand built rather than self-serve.
And whatever you already use: any tool available through an API or an MCP server, connected with your own account.
A tool built for exactly your job, and only that, will go deeper at that one job. This is for the jobs nothing covers, or the ones spread across three tools today.
The date and who was there, what was observed, what was decided, who owes what by when, and the points left open. The last two are what make the document useful a month later, and they are the two that shorthand notes usually lose.
With the facts that let anyone place the document: which site, which meeting, which date, who attended. Not with a formula. The magik puts those first because a report that opens on a sentence about the weather gets skimmed, and the decisions are what people came for.
It is the same material and a different magik: what was done today, who was on site, weather, deliveries, what is blocking. Written from the same notes, it costs one more pass rather than a second tool with its own login for the site manager.
That is the intended starting point. The lab takes your site meeting notes as you wrote them and turns them into the report: what was decided, who owes what, by when. You read it before it goes out, and that is where you fix whatever the shorthand swallowed.
They live in a collection, site by site. A point opened last week and not settled this week comes back in the next report instead of vanishing between two notebooks. That is what accumulated decisions make possible and what a blank page does not.
The report and the word to the client are two separate magiks, written from the same notes. One lists decisions and open points for the people working on site, the other tells the client where the project stands and what is expected of them. You read both before either leaves.
The output is text you read, correct and paste into the document you already send, with your letterhead on it. The lab holds the content and the memory of the open points, not your page layout, and it does not send anything to anybody on its own.
A tool built for exactly site managers and builders, and only that, will go deeper at that one job. This lab is for the jobs no tool covers, or the ones spread across three tools today, and it runs under your name.
Every audience is still open.
Nobody has taken a square on this idea yet. You declare your audience when you take the lab (“roofers in Brittany”, “plumbers around Paris”), and two people can start from the same idea on two different audiences without getting in each other’s way.
And it wears your name, not ours.
The bundle describes a lab that does not exist yet : the jobs it would do, and an example of each output.
Open Knowledge Format : plain markdown, re-importable into any agent. No account, no lock-in.
The quotes that went silent get a follow-up that sounds like you wrote it. Because you read it before it goes.
Your grant file is checked before you send it, so it does not come back three weeks later because one paper is missing.
The customer describes the noise. They get a plain explanation, a price range and whether it can wait. Before they call three other garages.
The estimate is drafted and the job is logged, without you writing it twice.
Still comparing tools? Best AI for site reports.