Public

Watch Studio

Follow a subject that keeps moving: know what changed, decide if it matters, and produce the piece it calls for. Without reading everything yourself.

Maya Brooks@maya-brooks5 magiks · updated Aug 5, 2026
Free account, takes a minute. Everything arrives editable.
How it runs

5 steps, and each one starts from what the last produced.

Most AI answers one big question in one go. This lab cuts the job into small steps instead: each step has its own tools and its own reference documents, does one thing well, and hands its result to the next. You stay in the loop where it matters.

01
Define your watch~10 min · ~$0.03 per run

What you are watching, why it matters to you, where to look, and what counts as a change worth your attention.

Goes inWhat are you watching, and why does it matter to you?, Where should we look? +1Comes outWatch profile
NOTEBOOKWatch Studio › Define your watchExample

Your watch

What you are watching The French rules on packaging for cosmetics sold online. Specifically : what must appear on the label, what must appear on the product page, and what the two do not have to share.

Why it matters to you You sell 40 references. A labelling change means a print run, a photo shoot and 40 page updates. You want six weeks of warning, not six days.

Where to look

SourceWhat it publishesRhythm
Légifrance, arrêtés cosmétiquesthe text itselfirregular
DGCCRF, avis aux professionnelsthe reading and the tolerancesmonthly
Cosmetic Europe, position paperswhat the sector is negotiatingquarterly

What counts as a change A published text, or an official reading that changes what must appear. Not : a press article, a competitor doing something new, a LinkedIn post from a lawyer.

What does not count Everything upstream of publication. Drafts, consultations and rumours are noise for you : you cannot reprint 40 labels on a rumour.

Read the full example

What Define your watch produces carries over here.

02
What's new~10 min · ~$0.08 per run

One sweep of the sources: what changed since last time, what is only noise, and what deserves a decision.

Goes inSince when?, Anything specific to check this time?Comes outChange report
UsesWeb searchExaFirecrawl
REPORTWatch Studio › What's newExample

Sweep of 11 March

Three sources read. One change, two noise.

Worth your attention DGCCRF published a notice on 6 March on the mention of the period after opening. It confirms the 12M symbol stays optional below a 30-month shelf life, and adds that the shelf life must now be justifiable on request. That last part is new.

Noise, and why

A trade press article announces « new labelling rules for 2026 ». It quotes a consultation opened in January, not a published text. Nothing to do.
A competitor changed its packaging. Their choice, no obligation attached.

What it means for you Nothing to reprint. Something to be able to produce : the shelf-life justification for each of your 40 references. If you have it in a supplier file, you are fine.

Next sweep Monday 18 March. Légifrance had nothing this week, which is the normal case.

Read the full example

What What's new produces carries over here.

03
Is this real?~6 min · ~$0.07 per run

Takes one change and checks it against the primary source before anyone acts on it.

Goes inWhat did you hear or read?, Where did it come from?Comes outVerification
UsesWeb searchFirecrawl
SPECWatch Studio › Is this real?Example

Verification: « shelf life must be justifiable »

The claim, as it reached you A newsletter states that since March, cosmetics sold online must display their shelf-life justification on the product page.

The primary source DGCCRF notice of 6 March 2026, section 4. Read in full.

What the text actually says The justification must be held by the person responsible and produced on request during a check. The word « display » does not appear. Nothing requires it on a public page.

Verdict: partly false. The obligation is real, its form is not. Someone turned « hold and produce » into « display », which is a different job and a different cost.

What to do Keep the justification in your product file. Do not touch your 40 pages.

Why this check mattered The two readings differ by about three weeks of work.

Read the full example

What Is this real? produces carries over here.

04
The piece it calls for~12 min · ~$0.03 per run

Turns a confirmed change into the thing you actually have to produce: a note to a client, an internal memo, a public post.

Goes inThe confirmed change, Who reads this? +1Comes outPiece
MANUSCRITWatch Studio › The piece it calls forExample

Shelf life, what changed and what does not

Subject: Shelf life, what changed and what does not

Hello,

A short note so nobody spends a week on this.

The DGCCRF notice of 6 March asks that the shelf life of each reference be justifiable on request. It does not ask for anything to be displayed. Our product pages do not change.

What we need: for each of the 40 references, the supplier document that establishes the shelf life, filed where a check would find it in ten minutes. Camille has the list, thirty-one are already there.

What we are not doing: reprinting labels, touching the site, or answering the newsletter that announced the opposite.

signed with your name

Read the full example

What The piece it calls for produces carries over here.

05
The log~6 min · ~$0.03 per run

What this watch has caught over time, so you can show your work and see what you keep missing.

Goes inWhich period?Comes outWatch log
REPORTWatch Studio › The logExample

The log

Since 12 January, 9 sweeps, 4 confirmed changes.

DateChangeSourceWhat followed
6 MarShelf-life justification to be heldDGCCRF noticeproduct file updated
2 FebAllergen list unchanged for 2026Légifrancenothing, and that was the useful answer
21 JanRecycled-content symbol becomes optionalarrêtésymbol dropped on next print run
14 JanConsultation opened on nano labellingDGCCRFwatched, not acted on

What this watch keeps missing Everything that comes from your suppliers rather than from the regulator. Two of the four changes above reached you first through a supplier email, days before the source published. The watch confirms, it does not warn.

What that suggests A supplier inbox is a better early signal than an official journal, and it is not in your sources.

Read the full example
Share this

Send this template to someone

The bundle carries the lab, its magiks and the examples already attached to them.

Open Knowledge Format : plain markdown, re-importable into any agent. No account, no lock-in.

Free to start

Build your first lab

Tell Mojo what eats your time. He builds you a lab that does it, wired to your tools. Yours to own and export.